Tag Archives: Neo-Nazism

When It Rains It Pours

Woooooow! What a day! It all began this morning when a friend abroad sends me a link to a 5,000-word article on the cancer-AIDS site Russia Inisder, written by its editor Charles Bausman. What exactly inspired Bausman to write 5,000 words? What topic drove him to expound at such length? Why it’s the “Jewish question,”  of course! Or to use Bausman’s words, the “Jewish problem.” Seriously, check out this excerpt:

Discussion of the Jewish problem (and ‘problem’ is the right word here) is obviously not going to be the focus of Russia Insider – we try to be primarily about Russia, but I am willing to give space to this issue, and not just as it relates to Russia. I invite all writers, including from the Alt-Right, to get in touch with me directly at charles@russia-insider.com with article ideas, proposals, or anything else, and yes, we will publish articles which use (((echoes))).

And because this is Bausman, that paragraph soliciting for articles is followed by:

It is my great regret that we are not in a position to pay authors for articles. If anyone reading this is in a position to help provide funding to pay writers on this important subject, that would be helpful, because it immediately raises the quality and depth of the writing. If you are interested, please get in touch with me directly.

Bausman’s “coming out” was apparently cheered by the pedantic neo-Nazi pseudo-intellectual Anatoly Karlin, whose own article was also published on Russia Insider. Using his incredibly high IQ, Karlin deduced that Russia watchers of Jewish descent reacting negatively toward an anti-Semitic screed must be strong evidence in favor of that screed’s central thesis. Imagine that- people of Jewish descent reacting negatively to something openly attacking them! Of course he also totally ignores the reactions of non-Jewish Russia journalists when making that point, but who are we to question the logic of such high-IQ individuals? And while it is not central to Duh Russophile’s piece, I have to quote the bizarre passage where he cites himself, if only to demonstrate how laughably fucked up these people are.

In my view, the reasons are ultimately psycho-sexual. Male Jews nowadays have it good in Russia, with many Slavic girls attracted to their wealth, intelligence and impeccable charm (if not their looks). But the position of Jewesses is the inverse. They find it hard to compete with those same Slavic chicks who tend to be both hotter and much more feminine than them; nor, like Jewish guys, can they compensate with intelligence, since it is considered far less important for women.

Well there’s a fine line between genius and madness, right?

Another Russia Insider contributor with a really creative alternative version of history published a warning to Bausman, approving of the discussion of the “Jewish problem” so long as he remembers to use nice language. He also reminds him to make sure to scapegoat some other nationalities for the “Russophobia” in the West, because of course nobody ever has a justifiable criticism of Russia. They’re all just irrational haters.

It should come as no shock that the site hasn’t taken down their numerous articles ranting about neo-Nazis and alleged anti-Semitism in Ukraine.


Do a search for “Ukrainian Nazis” and strap yourself in for the ride! 

Gee, Charles, what’s your beef with those neo-Nazis in Ukraine? They just shed that “Jewish taboo” as you call it, right?

In all seriousness, however, long-term Russia watchers know there’s no real contradiction here. Russia’s regime is far right, and it caters to the far right. More importantly, in the bizarro-world D&D game that is Russia’s propaganda narrative, being a neo-Nazi has nothing to do with holding Nazi beliefs but rather whether or not you support the Kremlin and its foreign policy goals. If you’re a far left Marxist (*ahem*) but you oppose Russia’s actions in Ukraine, you’re a “Nazi,” whereas if you are a literal fascist or neo-Nazi but you support those goals, you are not only not a fascist but you can even portray yourself on Kremlin media as an “anti-fascist!”

Of course this is something I’ve routinely pointed out dozens of times, and apart from Bausman’s foray into full-on Nazism being a great opportunity to say “I told you so” to some people on the left,  neither this piece nor Russia Insider is the real reason for this post. After this post blew up a tiny portion of Twitter, a follower introduced me to this link, which is basically a massive catalog of collaboration between the far-left and far-right. More specifically, it is a thorough investigation of so-called “red-brown alliances,” laying the foundation with a historical examination of the ideological background of such collaboration, then proceeding with a thorough examination of contemporary examples of this far-right/far-left collaboration.

If this sounds like “horseshoe theory,” it’s not. In fact, many rank and file leftists are totally unaware of these connections and would never work with some of the people named in this investigation if they knew what they were really about. But that’s just the thing- modern far-rightists often conceal their political identities, and instead latch on to some populist cause that also happens to animate leftists. They may present themselves as “anti-establishment,” “anti-capitalist,” “anti-war,” and the far-right entryist’s favorite cover, “anti-Zionist.”

Two things bear mentioning about this list before you check it out. First of all, it is packed with links and archived versions of said links. You can’t accuse the author of not backing up their claims- that’s for sure.

But more importantly, especially for leftists, is to note the common thread that is tying nearly all these people together- Russia, and most notably, Alexander Dugin and his Eurasianist movement. While Dugin’s actual influence in the Russian government are often overestimated, his influence in Russia’s foreign propaganda efforts is well-established. I would not be surprised to find that many of the Dugin-linked groups in the West reached out to him and his “philosophy” rather than vice versa.

This investigation only hammers home the point that the Western left (hell, any left) needs to take Russian influence operations seriously. Not only because this association with far rightists could be used by the establishment to discredit leftists, but first and foremost on principle alone. There is no legitimate reason why leftists should be forging alliances with the far right anywhere. We should not be sharing a platform with them or repeating the talking points and advancing the foreign policy goals of an imperialist, colonialist, reactionary regime that openly supports our enemies in our own homelands. Obviously we cannot stop such groups from claiming the same position as us on certain issues, but that doesn’t mean we need to embrace them or their benefactors- instead we should call them out wherever we catch them.

Moreover, the left needs to expose parties that engage in red-brown alliances in the name of “anti-imperialism.” Apart from the fact that many such organizations are in fact pro-imperialist so long as the empire in question is not American, it’s been my observation that those who embrace these connections with the far right or with reactionary regimes only end up going further in that direction instead of staying on left territory.

I’d suggest bookmarking that link and even downloading a copy of it should the site ever go offline. Hell, here it is again just in case you haven’t opened it yet. The key to fighting red-brown alliances is proper political education, but the first step is knowing that they exist, have been around for quite some time, and are an ever-present threat to revolutionary progressive politics.



Yes, this is still a thing

BBC brings us a story about a Swedish skinhead fighting for a Ukrainian para-military formation known for its nationalist composition.  No surprise there, considering that the leader of the battalion is also the leader of the National Socia- Oops! I mean Social National Assembly.  But when asked to elaborate by the BBC, he claimed it wasn’t a Neo-Nazi organization, but rather:

“The Social National Assembly is not a neo-Nazi organisation,” he said.

“It is a party of Ukrainian patriots who are giving their lives while the rich Europeans are only talking about supporting Ukraine.”

Usually I make this comment on the topic of Russian fascists, but here you can see that the mentality is 100% identical on the other side. To wit, when someone points out the fascist nature of an organization, someone will make the claim that they are “not fascists, but patriots!” Because fascists weren’t patriots, remember? They hated patriotism and always talked about how much their respective countries sucked.

Fascists? Oh my GOD! You must be listening to Putin's state run media! These are just German patriots trying to defend their country and liberate Ukraine from the Communists, who are the REAL fascists!

Fascists? Oh my GOD! You must be listening to Putin’s state run media! These are just German patriots trying to defend their country and liberate Ukraine from the Communists, who are the REAL fascists!

I’ve seen Maidan supporters claiming to be liberals or non-nationalists making similarly-worded defenses for groups like Praviy Sektor and Svoboda.  It ranges from flat out support to something along the lines of “I’m not a nationalist, but groups like Praviy Sektor and Svoboda are just patriots fighting for Ukraine!”  Yeah, I’m not racist or anything, but groups like the KKK are just fighting for America.  Brilliant fucking logic there, dipshit. Ukraine’s in good hands with Maidan supporters at the helm!

So is the Social National Assembly fascist? Well let’s take a look at some of their stated goals according to the BBC article.

“to prepare Ukraine for further expansion and to struggle for the liberation of the entire White Race from the domination of the internationalist speculative capital”

“to punish severely sexual perversions and any interracial contacts that lead to the extinction of the white man”

This, according to experts, is a typical neo-Nazi narrative.

Uh yeah, no shit, “experts.” This is more overtly Nazi than most Eastern European nationalist organizations, especially those in Russia.  So how is it that organizations which put out shit like this can claim they aren’t fascist, neo-Nazi, or whatever?

One thing you need to understand about Eastern Europe, and particularly Russia and the Former Soviet Union, is that fascism isn’t really about ideology. It’s not a set of beliefs about the state, society, etc. Fascists are people opposed to you or “your” country. That is all. This is why you have Russians spouting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and who talk about the superiority of the “white race”(of which they weren’t considered a part for most of the concept’s existence) and yet still demand international solidarity for their “struggle against fascism.” This is why Ukrainian liberals can defend their own nationalists while screaming about the same behavior among the Donbass militias. It’s why Russian “leftists” can ignore cossacks with White Guard insignia who openly speak of creating a Russian, Orthodox empire, while jumping on a story like this about a Swedish skinhead fighting for the Ukrainian government.  Both sides adhere to a primitive, moronic worldview which tells them that only the fascist associations of their opponents matter, and that this somehow negates or cancels out their own.  If a Ukrainian can show us that a particular volunteer in Eastern Ukraine has an SS tattoo, this somehow invalidates the hundreds if not thousands of photos showing Ukrainian nationalists.  Yes, they actually think that way, and they are the same.  

I cannot stress that last point enough. Some people, even those with experience in Russia, foolishly buy into the notion that most Maidan supporters are actually more liberal, tolerant, and intelligent than the Russians who support separatism and who are currently railing against the Maidan movement. Nothing is further from the truth.  These people are the same in terms of mentality and their complete lack of capacity for critical thinking. Their mind can only conceive of political struggle as a sort of football match between their national team and a rival’s team. This may be occasionally peppered with meaningless bullshit jargon like “civil society” and other buzzwords gleaned from various NGOs. But make no mistake, the politically savvy, tolerant, liberal, intellectual Kievian hipster is a myth made up for Western consumption.  What these people say when they don’t think anyone is watching totally destroys that image.  In reality, these people are no different from the “Novorossiya” imperialists across the border in Russia.

Both Maidan fanatics and Russian imperialists are more than happy to lie to outside observers in a sociopathic manner, pissing on your leg while telling you it’s raining. That’s why the Social National Assembly’s leader told the BBC reporter that it’s not a neo-Nazi organization. He was not at all concerned that the reporter could easily check the claim via the internet, because in Ukraine as in Russia, saying things makes them true, even if you don’t believe what you’re saying. In recent times I’ve seen dozens of Russian “Communists” and anti-government Ukrainian “leftists” pull the exact same thing every time I showed them indisputable evidence of fascist, imperialist, and pro-capitalist behavior on the part of the “governments” of the unrecognized republics in the Donbass.

In a nutshell, if you want to understand Russo-Ukrainian lying techniques, you need to watch this clip where Louis CK explains how his daughter “hides” when playing hide & seek.

That’s what it’s like. They tell you they’re fighting fascists, and then you ask them why they are associating with fascists, and they tell you “They’re not fascists! They are patriots fighting for their country!” And at this point you want to scream at your monitor, “YOU KNOW I CAN READ RUSSIAN AND UKRAINIAN RIGHT? YOU KNOW I HAVE A VKONTAKTE ACCOUNT AND I CAN SEE WHAT YOUR SIDE IS SAYING? YOU KNOW I CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WROTE TO THAT OTHER GUY IN THE CONVERSATION RIGHT THERE?!”  

Alright enough of that. I just wanted to highlight something the BBC reporter felt compelled to include in his article.

Ukraine is a democratic state, which held a democratic election in May, where the far right and nationalist parties got hardly any votes. These views are not popular with the electorate.

This line of bullshit has been peddled by Maidan apologists since the elections in May, as if the loss of Crimea and an uprising in the East had nothing to do with the way people voted. Some have even taken results of the European elections, in which European nationalist parties apparently made significant gains, to support the equally idiotic claim that Europe is more right-wing than Ukraine.  Really? Remind me what Maidan was about again? Oh right- joining Europe.

Aside from those obvious logical problems, whether or not Ukraine is a “democratic” state is irrelevant here. Yanukovych was a democratically elected president. He got overthrown, largely thanks to the actions of those totally unpopular nationalist thugs. That means that if these nationalists should grow tired of Ukraine’s “democratic” regime, they have every reason to believe that they can easily replace that government via force, and Tim Snyder’s Diverse Rainbow Coalition of peaceful protesters can’t do shit about it. History proves again and again that small, organized groups willing to fight can decide major political matters in spite of their size.

Lastly, and most importantly, I dispute the claim that the ideas held by groups like the Social National Assembly are not popular in Ukraine, at least among the pro-Maidan side. See, when I saw Maidan succeed, my reaction was very different from that of the Russians. Rather than thinking, “Oh no they’re going to brutally slaughter all the Russian speakers,” I was thinking more along the lines of “Shit, now they will control the schools, the universities, the ministry of education, the media, etc.”  What do I mean by control? Well you see, while many Maidan supporters reject the ideology of nationalist groups, they share certain core concepts. Among these are the following-

-The only legitimate Ukrainian state in the 20th century was that which was declared in 1917. The Ukrainian SSR was an illegal occupation. Communism and fascism are the same.

-The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the UPA(Ukrainian Insurgent Army) were patriots who fought to liberate Ukraine. They fought against the Soviets and the Germans.

-All of Ukraine’s problems are due to Russia and Communists. The reason why things went to shit in 1991 was because the nationalist leaders were really former Communists who were secretly still Communists. The Orange Revolution of 2004 was supposed to deal with this but wouldn’t you know, it turns out that was led by former Communists too.  After a few more years of utter failure from Poroshenko, we’ll soon be hearing about how Maidan’s leaders, who promised to sweep away all the vestiges of the USSR, were actually all Communists.

-Wearing a piece of traditional Ukrainian clothing or a traditional hairstyle makes you a true Ukrainian like everyone else. It doesn’t matter if your personal wealth is literally hundreds of times larger than the average Ukrainian worker.

These are ideas which have permeated Ukrainian politics for quite some time and to date I have seen no attempt by Maidan supporters to sever their movement from their nationalist fellow travelers who hold the same ideas.  The only time Maidan supporters even make this attempt is when they get caught red-handed and it’s politically inconvenient, in which case the conversation quickly turns to whataboutism and the “Russo-Ukrainian Fascist Negation Principle,” whereby pointing out fascists in Russia literally makes Ukrainian fascists cease to exist.  With Maidan-linked parties fully in control of most of Ukraine, especially since the Russian imperialists seem happy to cede everything West of the Dnieper to them, they will control the means to disseminate information and subsequent generations of Ukrainian youth will be inundated with the mythology. Government failures can always be blamed on Russia, and Russia seems happy to play the part.

Getting back to the subject of the mythology, Maidan supporters, so vehemently anti-socialist despite the fact that socialism is the very thing Ukraine needs, constantly insist that Ukraine will somehow succeed if only it somehow manages to totally free itself from its Soviet past.  Well not all of its Soviet past of course. They still want the Crimea, the former Novorossiya territory, and I’m sure they don’t want Galicia going back to Poland. I’m sure they also want the road networks, the mines, the schools, the hospitals, and all those things. But aside from all that, Ukraine must emerge from the past and leave that old, backward Soviet legacy in the dustbin of history! And it will do this by fanatically embracing early 20th century nationalism and symbols of a traditional peasantry which lived in near-medieval conditions until lifted out of that poverty by… Uh…er…um…GOD! Yes, it was a miracle!

Dnieper dam. A vestige of  Soviet totalitarian occupation. We must keep it though. Necessary evil.

Dnieper dam. A vestige of Soviet totalitarian occupation. We must keep it though. Necessary evil.

Behold, symbols of the future for New Ukraine!

Behold, symbols of the future for New Ukraine!

The conclusion one should get from this is that like Russia, Ukraine suffers from a disease of “patriots” and ridiculous, ahistorical notions of a mythical past which never existed.  In the case of Maidan, there can be no doubt that the majority of supporters are not in fact radical nationalists and I’m sure many of them are decent people, but it’s clear that many of them still hold on to and propagate certain beliefs and this overall narrative becomes the soil in which more radical nationalism grows. This is very similar to the way Russian schools whitewash the history of the Russian empire and make claims that it was poised to become a world economic leader that could have equaled the US or Germany today had it not been for those damned Bolsheviks.

It’s very hard to explain how this Ukrainian nationalism works to Americans, but the best example I can think of is the Tea Party.  Do you get offended when you hear a Tea Party speaker referring to their movement as “real Americans?” Do you get angry that you might not be considered a “real” American because you don’t support the idea that America was founded as a Christian nation, that abortion should be illegal or highly restricted, that marriage should be legally defined as being between one man and one woman, or simply because you don’t worship the military, bald eagles, NASCAR, or the NFL? Well you see that’s what it’s like being a Ukrainian who doesn’t buy into the national myth of Ukraine. I and others have said it before; this isn’t so much of a struggle between Russians and Ukrainians as it is between groups of Ukrainians who disagree on what Ukraine should be. Many Ukrainians speak Ukrainian and prefer to live in Ukraine if not a European Union affiliated Ukraine. But what they don’t want is to be told that grandpa was wounded twice fighting for an illegal occupation while collaborators who participated in brutal mass killings and ethnic cleansing are Ukraine’s heroes. They don’t want their kids hearing these things in school.  You could often hear this sentiment expressed by people in the Crimea prior to annexation or in the Donbass.  But the thing about Maidan is that you can’t object to this and still support independent Ukraine, oppose Yanukovych, etc. If you don’t buy into the myths, you’re a Russian, you’re a “vatnik.”

As I both feared and predicted, many of those Ukrainians began to identify with Russia, and this is what you’re seeing in Eastern Ukraine now. Both Russian imperialists and Ukrainian nationalists prefer this state of affairs. Ukrainian nationalists and their “liberal” hosts don’t want to accept as Ukrainian those who refuse to buy into their basic national myths. On the other side, Russian nationalists don’t want to tolerate signs or notions of a distinct Ukrainian identity, at least one which isn’t defined and shaped by Moscow. Ukrainian nationalists want to write off the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic as an illegal occupation by Moscow, while Russian nationalists want to pretend that the Ukrainian SSR was no more than a part of a Russian empire masked under a red flag, and all socialist Ukraine’s accomplishments were but “gifts” handed down by the generous Russians rather than the product of labor on the part of the Ukrainian SSR’s citizens.

It is clear that for Ukraine to survive and advance, it is not the Soviet legacy which must be totally eliminated but rather the national “myth” that has plagued Ukraine throughout the 20th century up to this day.  Even if one blames Russia for destroying the territorial integrity of Ukraine and seizing its territory in the Crimea, one can’t ignore the fact that nationalists deliberately picked a fight with a far larger country with far greater resources and which is still considered a regional military power. That alone proves these people incompetent and incapable of properly governing Ukraine. Ukraine needs new ideas, and a new, inclusive sense of identity. It needs to reject myth and the love of superficial national symbols wielded by oligarchs who exhort the people to patriotism while robbing them blind and robbing the country of its future. And what about Russia? Yes, what about Russia? When Ukraine has managed to do what I have suggested, Ukraine may truly become an example which Russians can follow.  Kyiv, and not Moscow, may become the center of a new Russian culture that is again progressive, inclusive, and most of all free of the nationalist disease that plagues so much of Eastern Europe.  But until the cancer of football mentality politics and nationalism is fully removed from Ukraine, the country is doomed.