Tag Archives: Kiselyov


Well here’s a big shock- Russia’s most prestigious Sunday news program just ran a completely fabricated story, using hilariously bad fake documents as “proof.” In this case, phony leaked “CIA” documents are supposed to show a conversation between businessman Bill Browder and Alexei Navalny, wherein in the former personally asks the latter to organize some kind of color revolution and undermine the Russian government.

As the reader has no doubt guessed, the English text, supposedly written by CIA employees, contains numerous mistakes in grammar and syntax, leading some to suggest that it was most likely done with Google translate and then checked by a non-native speaker of English. In my cursory examination I found stylistic features consistent with the writing of a Russian native speaker, which are all easy to spot when you spend years proofreading all manner of Russian-to-English translations. And as you might have guessed, Navalny hasn’t been arrested for treason.

But do I really need to point any of that out? Do I really need to debunk any of this story? If you were reading the autobiography of a man claiming to be a trained ninja who got 300 confirmed kills in Afghanistan and saved earth from an ancient demon that had been awakened by an evil sorcerer, would you feel the need to pick out all the inconsistencies in the man’s story or would you just dismiss it off hand? Sure, sometimes it can be fun to point out errors in fake news stories just as it can be fun to do so with a really awful film. Then again, sometimes it isn’t fun. Sometimes it’s work. Therefore when I saw this story, I figured there was another angle I should cover. I want to tell you the real reason they did this story- it’s their answer to the Panama Papers leak.

“Now wait just a darn minute,” you say, talking like a character in a 1940’s anti-Communist propaganda film. “How can you compare this nonsensical made up story to the Panama Papers, a massive leak of documents that took dozens of journalists from many different countries over a year to investigate?” Well dear reader, look at the timing. It’s Kiselyov’s first Sunday program since the leak. It’s about a leak as well.

“Well alright but hold on one minute there,” you say, still in your 1940’s voice. “You may be right about the timing and the subjects are similar, but as I said before, the Panama Papers were part of a major international investigation and this story seems like they just pulled it out of their ass!” Ah but that’s just it, dear reader. To them there is no difference.

Obviously there are people working throughout the Russian state media and the state itself who are fully aware that they produce bullshit. Same goes for the audience. But in all those groups you have people who actually believe in this “information war” idiocy, and to them there’s no difference between the Panama Papers and their made-up, bullshit story about Browder and Navalny. Let me make something clear- it’s not that these people believe that their story is real. They know it’s bullshit. The thing is that they think the Panama Papers are also bullshit that someone just pulled out of their ass, and this justifies them making up their own stories.

One has to realize that none of the people who work in the Russian media have ever really lived under a free press. The Tsarist press was controlled and censored. We all know the Soviet press was. The 90’s Russian press was largely controlled by various oligarchs and there were no journalistic standards. As such, much of the Russian media, including foreign language outlets like RT, is now run by favored bureaucrats who don’t understand anything about journalism. They look at the rest of the world’s media and try to emulate what they think it is. The problem is that they also tell themselves that it’s really the same as their own media, and they’re waging information warfare against Russia- ergo their own media must answer back in kind.

I remember one writer used the term “cargo cult” to refer to RT and the rest of the Russian state media. This is very apt. Like a real cargo cult, they watch something they don’t understand (free press in other countries), and then emulate them without actually understand what they’re doing. The original cargo cults believed that the US and Japanese military personnel they observed were engaged in strange and elaborate rituals which brought favors from flying gods. When it comes to the Russian media it seems at times they literally believe that some Western journalists can just get together and cook up a story about Putin’s friends and offshore accounts with no actual investigation or evidence, and their bosses will sign off on the story with no questions. Either that, or they think CIA agents order these journalists, many of whom work for private corporations, to publish mean things about the Dear Leader. They do this, and nothing happens and nobody comes out and exposes it.

So the next time there’s a major story that’s got the Russian media in hysterics, keep it in mind. If you see a really hilarious or outlandish fake story in the major Russian media shortly thereafter, it’s probably their “answer.” In their mind, the other story was made up, so they can make up their own story. They tell themselves this and dissent is apparently not tolerated, otherwise we should have seen an improvement in their propaganda techniques over the past two years instead of a very noticeable decline. In 2014 they said Russia had weaponized information, but that weapon is starting to look really rusty now.

Hell freezes over

What better way to commemorate the US Supreme Court’s decision on same sex marriage than to take a look at the reaction of Russian TV host Dmitry Kiselyov after hearing the news? Man he must have had a field day with this, seeing as how he’s always trying to portray Western society as degenerate and perverse. Listening to him and some other Russian propagandists, you’d think every major street in America has a gay pride parade every weekend. I’m sure he must have blew his top on his last show. Let’s see what he said.

“One of the most controversial conservative pundits in the Russian television, Dmitry Kiselyov, has unexpectedly stated his support for same-sex civil unions.”

HA HA! He- Wait. What? He said what?!

“On his TV show this week, Kiselyov told viewers, “We can manage to make life easier for adults who want—both informally and formally—the responsibility of taking care of each other. In the end, love works wonders, and who’s against that?” Kiselyov also stated plainly, “The LGBT community is a fact.”

What is going on here? Did Victoria Nuland give him a cookie? Did someone put Russophobia drugs in his tea? How did this happen?

All joking aside, I actually commend Kiselyov not only for what he said, but for not using what would have been a perfect opportunity to stoke not only more homophobia, but more anti-American hatred as well. Kiselyov is by no means a little guy, but his position is also another reason why his statement could be considered bold, especially in these times.

Yes, everyone remembers what this man has said before about LGBT people. Yes, he is part of a propaganda machine that will no doubt continue to put out homophobic propaganda to distract from the failures of the corrupt government, but it’s hard to believe that Kiselyov would take such a risk of saying such a thing, especially considering his audience, if he didn’t have some sincere feelings backing those words.

And yes, those words are a far cry from taking a firm stand on equality, but few heterosexual people my age can honestly claim they were for total LGBT equality all their lives. I was raised in a conservative, religious environment. I wasn’t exposed to Westboro Baptist Church-levels of hatred and I never obsessed over the issue, but to say my views were enlightened or progressive would be an utter lie. I harbored negative opinions about gays and their rights in spite of the fact that for many years I lived in a neighborhood with a very large, noticeable gay presence, and I even worked a summer job at a gay-owned business. Years later I would kick myself for being so stupid as to harbor negative thoughts towards people who had never once done anything remotely negative toward me. Looking back it seemed like wanting to see people treated like second-class citizens because they happened to have green eyes or brown hair.

I know I said and wrote a lot of horrible things back in those days and I’d hate to be judged by those words instead of what I believe since I learned the truth about issues like this one. We cannot rule out the possibility that Kiselyov might be going through his own transformation, trying to express a sincere opinion and still remain safe. When it comes from Kiselyov, we should not give into the crushing Russian cynicism and give the man credit, with caution of course.

I have to admit I want to believe he’s being sincere. I want to believe love wins.