Gun fatigue

Today’s post isn’t about Russia, but as a responsible ex-gun owner I felt I have to comment on recent events in America. Hopefully this will satisfy some of those “WHY COME YOU NEVER WRITE ABOUT THE WEST?!” folks.

I found out about the recent shooting in Oregon only because a friend here in Russia asked me about it on Facebook. I can’t really say much about the details because honestly I no longer pay much attention to these stories anymore. It’s just something that happens again and again, with the same results every time.

I remember a few days after the Aurora, Colorado cinema shooting I went to see a film in Moscow. The news of the Aurora shooting was fresh in my mind. The lights in the theater began to dim, and I thought about how great it is that I can just relax and enjoy a film without ever considering that a mad man armed with a military-style weapon might burst in and start killing people. In my entire time in Moscow, I have walked down streets late at night, visited 24-hour shops, and never once felt that I might risk walking into a robbery in progress and getting shot. What a luxury.

Nowadays I can barely stand to look at the coverage of mass shootings. I know each one will be followed by a tsunami of idiocy from “gun people,” “ammosexuals” as some people call them. These days it’s much worse, because many mass shootings are now accompanied by conspiracy theories which only compound the flagrant disrespect to the victims and their families. And of course, thanks to social media, a legion of gun folks has to invade every discussion and talk about what they would have done.

Usually I try to write with a more flowing style and avoid creating listicles, but when it comes to something like this I’m so goddamned tired that by now I’m ready to chuck all prose out the window. Here are my short and fast thoughts about the danger of mass gun violence in America.

-One marvels at the way many of the same people who insist we can’t do anything to control the proliferation of firearms, claiming “criminals will always get guns,” tend to be the very same people who want tight if not total control over abortion or if not that, immigration. I never hear them say things like: “I’m opposed to abortion, but criminals will get them anyway so I guess we can’t regulate it.” Ditto or illegal immigration. No, when it comes to those issues, not only is “big government” the solution, but it’s also perfectly competent to do something about it.

You could take it further. Take any law at all. Drinking age? Teenage drinkers will always get alcohol. Drugs? Kids will always get drugs. So naturally the answer in these situations must also be: do absolutely nothing.

And that’s just the point. There are a lot of ways to regulate guns and ammunition, ways which don’t necessarily involve confiscation, which could actually help. Will they eliminate gun violence entirely, so long as so many privately owned guns exist? Probably not. But what is the harm in reducing gun violence? We can’t stop kids from drinking but we still require cashiers to card under 35 because the fact is that this does make it really difficult to get alcohol when you’re underage. Trust me on that.

-These people also tend to be the same ones telling us how we should respect policemen for doing such a “dangerous” job. First of all, being a cop is nowhere near the top dangerous job in America. But when cops die in the line of duty, what is it that kills them? Oh right- guns.

Of course that’s not the only contradiction these people hold. They also tell us that guns are necessary to defend ourselves from a police-state, and yet at the same time they tell us to give cops our utmost, reverent respect. How is that supposed to work, exactly? Please let me know when we’re allowed to start shooting at cops en masse. I don’t have time to follow this twisted logic.

-No, I do not give a shit about “what you would do” in this situation with your concealed carry weapon. I’ll tell you what you’d most likely do- run the hell away (good choice) or freeze and either get pulled out of danger or get shot.

Do I really need to point out how many shooting sprees happen without some civilian hero coming to the rescue? Even this one involved a trained veteran with a concealed firearm who, quite correctly, made the decision not to engage the shooter. He had an advantage; he at least had the chance to snap out of whatever he was doing and rationally weigh his options. You may not be so lucky. In fact, count on it.

You see, just yesterday, back in 1993, 18 US servicemen were killed in the line of duty executing a raid in Mogadishu, Somalia. These men were mostly Rangers and Delta Force, essentially some of the best trained warriors in the world at that time. They knew they were going on a raid, that had rules of engagement, and in spite of that, some of them still didn’t make it home. Granted, they were facing hundreds of militia from all directions, but it’s not meant to be a perfect analogy.

The point is that when you encounter an active shooter, it will not be in a warzone where armed confrontation is the daily norm. You are not serving in the armed forces with a mandate to kill if necessary. You’re buying ice cream for the kids’ birthday party and trying to remember if any of their friends are allergic to anything. You’re wondering if you were supposed to pick up the dry-cleaning or if your spouse said they would do that. You’re thinking about a million other things that have nothing to do with being in a gun fight when suddenly POP! What was that? A backfire? POP! POP! Those are gunshots! Where are they coming from? Now people are screaming and running in every direction. You have no idea if the cops are already responding. If they are, you could be mistaken for the shooter. How many shooters are there? Could they have body armor? The shooter almost certainly outguns you- he planned this shit. Now that your head is filled with all these questions as your brain wakes up to the fact that you are now a part of tonight’s top local news story, are you sure you’re going to pull out your Glock and be a hero? Are you sure you’re going hit only the target and not any innocent bystanders? Trained police miss most of the time.

As you can see, it’s not exactly going the way it does in your head when you write your Monday-morning quarterback strategies on your favorite gun forum. That’s how extreme situations are- extreme. You don’t experience them every day, so when they happen it’s really hard to predict what you’ll do. Things like the normalcy bias work against us, preventing us from acting even if we could do something. Remember those open carry morons who were running every day errands while strapped with Kalashnikovs and AR’s? What would you do if you’re that “good guy with a gun” in a restaurant and an overweight, white, neckbearded man walks in with an assault rifle dangling from a tactical sling? This could be your chance! Draw down on him? But wait, if you do, you’re now a threat to him, and he has the right to open fire on you. He’s going for his weapon, now you have to put him down. If you keep your weapon holstered, he might actually be a spree-shooter.

Violence is often shocking because of the normalcy bias and the awkwardness that precedes it. We live in societies where people aren’t supposed to do violence against one another and we’re expected to behave in a calm rational manner most of the time. When someone appears to be getting upset, it might not be clear what they’re really feeling and thinking. Take a look at this brilliant martial arts video, for example:

When the “victim” understands he’s part of a demonstration, it’s easy to apply a knife disarm (my best recommendation when a knife is involved- fucking run). But then the instructor disarms the victim by seeming to change moods. His victim, and maybe a few of the bystanders seem to be wondering “Is he serious? He was joking just a second ago.” Then BAM! He attacks. The victim has no chance. Again, go back to our scenario with the man open carrying a gun into a store or restaurant. As soon as you brandish that weapon against him, he now has a decent self-defense case himself. Someone has to commit, and they’d better be right. They’d also better be on target too.

-Please, stop talking about how your guns secure your liberty. Once again, most of you people tend to be the same folks who are telling us we should do what police tell us to do and respect them for their dangerous job. True, privately held firearms would be problematic for the US government if they ever decided to go full-on dictatorship for any reason (which is un-fucking-likely), but if you think you’re going to take on the US military by going Guevara in the woods you’d better start reading up on the combat capabilities of Reaper drones. What is more, if you really believe that the government is going to do this, you should be preparing right now. Go off the grid, don’t go on Youtube. Believe me, anything less and they’ll be all over you. Put up or shut up.

Just one more favor, by the way, stop bringing up the Holocaust and the Warsaw Ghetto uprising to justify why we should have no reasonable restrictions on guns at all. It’s just downright offensive, not only to Jews, but to anyone of basic intelligence. The fact is that lots of populations in Europe had far more firepower than the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto, and this did not stop them from getting slaughtered en masse at various times by the Werhmacht or Axis anti-partisan units. You are not in a war. You are not persecuted.

I realize this post might not come off as articulate as usual but what can I say? I’m getting sick of this shit. I survived an uneventful time in the army only to be robbed at gunpoint by two young gentlemen who appeared to be no older than 19 on my third day of work at a Circle K. I drove a pickup truck across state lines all the time and managed to avoid getting in an accident, including one time when I nearly hit a couple cows walking across Route 66. I’ve lived abroad most of my adult life, spending time in a front line town in Ukraine that got shelled every day, including while my colleagues and I were there. The country I’m living in is getting more insane and unstable by the week. And in spite of surviving all of this, I can’t help but feel concerned about finally being able to accomplish my goals and build a sound life in the US and then one day losing it all because I happened to be in the wrong shopping mall. Or the wrong gym. Or the wrong restaurant. Or the wrong fucking movie theater. If not me, it could be my wife, our future kid, or someone else close to me. So much can be lost in an instant because of some total fuckwad who’s upset because girls don’t like him or he blames black people, Jews, liberals, or anyone but himself for his own failures in life.

I want some kind of competent restrictions for gun ownership. I’m willing to undergo mental health screening. I’m willing to demonstrate my proficiency with firearms and their safe handling- I’ve basically done so several times in my life. So how about you, self-proclaimed “responsible gun owners?” Are you sure you know how to handle those things properly? Why wouldn’t you want to be certified?

I want more restrictions because while I’ll freely admit that I would still enjoy popping off rounds from a Kalashnikov, I want to make sure that’s the only thing weapons like that are used for in the States. I’m not “afraid” of guns. I’ve handled firearms since nine, “owned” them since 16. I’ve fired everything from a .22 rifle to the M2 Browning .50 cal heavy machine gun. But like I said, I was robbed by a punk armed with a Ruger just five minutes before closing. I’ve lost two friends to suicide with firearms. I don’t claim to know exactly what kind of restrictions or legislation can reduce this violence, but it’s time to start discussing what can be done and what needs to be done. I’m willing to accept a little “infringement” in the form of less convenience when it comes to shooting cans of starter fluid with a Romanian AK if it means fewer Sandy Hooks or Roseburgs. The dead have no rights.


I’ll just leave this here.

21 thoughts on “Gun fatigue

  1. gbd_crwx

    This is all based on the second amendment, right? Maybe it is because I’m not a native speaker but the sentence “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” seems like two unrelated sentences forced together, doesn’t it? I fail to fully see how the first part connects to the second.

    1. Jim Kovpak Post author

      This is kind of like saying: “Insofar as” or “since” a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state.

      Early on, the Founding Fathers preferred local militias to a standing army. Things like Shay’s rebellion, the War of 1812, and later the Civil War gradually forced the United States to move further toward a regular army.

      Of course that “militia” became the National Guard, the official heir to the old militia. The thing that gets me is that gunnut interpretations of that well-regulated part say it really means “well drilled or trained.” Okay, then does that mean there should be special regulations to determine a person’s training and competency if they want to handle firearms? Heavens no, they’ll respond. We can’t regulate guns in any way or else…Hitler in America!

      1. gbd_crwx

        So it ,might be argued that they had something like the Swiss system in mind? (BTW, just because the founding fathers thought something, has that to stand until time eternal?)

  2. Admin

    Sandy hook – there is just too much of stuff hard to explain. Could post lot but … Anyway imagine your child was brutally murdured 3 days ago and you.. Smile? Joke? Laugh? Than before speech get into role of victim?

    1. Jim Kovpak Post author

      Things like this ARE hard to explain. That doesn’t point to them being a hoax. If you have hard evidence, let’s see it. I’d also like to know the motive of this hoax.

      1. Admin

        First of all I don’t think that every single shooting is hoax. But I also – similar to you – stopped investigating each shooting after Sandy Hook. Simply – I draw my conclusions and don’t want to invest in it any more time. But if you are interested in evidence than I would recommend to you watch this material:

        As for motive – as usual – Social engineering Imagine you can shape public mind with events that doesn’t even happen? Great power. Watch this movie:

        “But… but… that can’t happen! “Government” ( would never do that!” Yeah,…. right… only thing is… it has done it before, was caught… told it stopped. And we should believe that.

        Look man.. I am no fan of criminal putin regime that now tries to demonize US, EU, west etc. I am from Latvia, I have traveled to Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, UK, Germany, Czech republic, Slovakia, Netherlands, Switzerland, Russia and USA. I loved traveling USA. Great country. But there is shit coming our way and those are not lizard people from NWO conspiracies. Simply elite with power who wants more power. Not so complicated. And guess what – they don’t take part in elections.

      2. Jim Kovpak Post author

        So this ONE event is some kind of social engineering scheme…Do do what, exactly? Why not do this with every mass shooting? Indeed, several other recent mass shootings also have their attached conspiracy theories.

  3. A.I.Schmelzer

    Having been on the receiving end of a knife once, I fully and 100% second the “run the fuck away” solution when being accosted/attacked with one.

    If you want other reasons why running the fuck away is smart, here you go:

    1: Opponents in a street situation will generally outnumber you. If they would not, they would have picked on someone they outnumber. Against a group, and given generalized group dynamics, you only have to be better in running then the slowest dude in that group to successfully run away. To successfully fight them, you have to be stronger then all of them together.
    Unless you happen to be an AI possessing an MBT that/who ran out of gas, running away is simply better.

    2: Even if you are slow, your running away will be far more motivated then the hostiles pursuit.

    3: Feeling heroic? Run away while shouting very loudly for help/Cops, or bluff and shout “Police, Police, come here” (indicating that police are close when they arent). You will “tie up” people that pursue you longer/better by running away from them then by trying to fight them.

    4: “Pro Tip” when running away, disregard traffic lights and seek out considerable vehicle traffic. The odds of getting driven over while pursuing you are probably higher then the odds of you seriously hurting a group of armed attackers. Keep shouting things like “help” or “drive the murderers over!”.

    Other then that:
    -When trying to get help, be specific “you in the Red shirt call the police” gets more result then “someone call the police”.
    -Know how to deescalate. 90% of fights are avoidable if you deescalate early enough, are decent in facegiving and generating socially safe retreats and generally shut out your monkeybrain.

  4. Callum Carmichael

    Must not forget the 21 foot rule. If you’re carrying a gun in a holster and someone attacks unexpectedly with a knife, they need to be 21 feet away from you for you to be able to draw your gun and shoot them without getting stabbed.

    Actually that (excellent) knife video reminds me of some sparring we did at my HEMA club. We had a guy with a knife and a guy without and the unarmed guy had to get the knife before he got stabbed.

    It was totally in the contrived martial arts context that the big guy in that video was saying never happens for real, and I think I still got stabbed about 4-5 times on average before I could take the knife. As the knife-weilder, it’s dead easy to bypass someone’s defense even if they’re ready for you.

  5. sglover

    “What would you do if you’re that ‘good guy with a gun’ in a restaurant and an overweight, white, neckbearded man walks in with an assault rifle dangling from a tactical sling? This could be your chance! Draw down on him? But wait, if you do, you’re now a threat to him, and he has the right to open fire on you. ”

    I know this isn’t what you intended, but when I read this scenario I thought that this would be a perfect, glorious encounter for any two enthusiasts of the idiotic “stand your ground” laws. Dual (bit of a pun there), mutually nominated Darwin Awards!

    Those guys who insist on flaunting their 2nd Amendment rights by toting AK-47’s and AR-15’s in the line at Arby’s are the dictionary definition of “asswipe”.

    1. gbd_crwx

      Well,that is even those too would have loved ones. Not to mention, with an assault weapon in a crowded Place are you sure they will only hit each other?

  6. A.I.Schmelzer

    In the USA, extra “hilarity” will result from really really thin walls. We tend to have more solid walls in Germany, so if I spontaenously transfer into a German Gun Nut, and shoot a home invader with my trusty G3 (there are “sport version” which dont feature automatic fire which can be legally gained, but there are a ton of hoops to jump though, among them explaining to a state attorney why the fuck I need a G3 for personal defence, storing the G3 and the ammunition is seperate and secure safes, having everything ready at snap inspection and regularly doing firearms training forever) then I am only perforating 1 or 2 walls in addition to (hopefully) the target. If I would do this in the USA, the bullet would probably go through half the block.

  7. Mike Spindell

    This was a brilliant post because it gets to the heart of the matter by demolishing the biggest logical fallacies relied upon by the anti-gun legislation crowd. Whether having a gun will make you more safe from attack is always a crapshoot, with the odds being heavily in favor of it won’t. This has been shown to be true, yet is discounted by the NRA supporters. I think though that the reason this exists as such a hotly disputed issue in America has more to do with American mythology, than it does with American reality.

    In America we (mostly males) have been brought up with the myth that to truly be a “man”, we have to be tough enough to defend ourselves. Now while I imagine this is true world wide with males, where America differs is in the myth of the heroic gunfighting individual, righting wrongs. This comes from the idea of the “winning” of the “Western Frontier” and rugged individualism. About 7 movies for instance have been made about the “heroic” “Gunfight at the OK Corral”. Marshal Wyatt Earp and his brothers fought the “evil” Clanton gang. The truth is that Earp was less a lawman and more a pimp, the Earps out-weaponed and out manned the Clantons etc. Yet the myth of heroism was spread by the media of the day and later in film. I could go on and on, but the point is that many American males have been infused with the heroic fantasies of imagining themselves as “heroes” in their life movies. The author of this piece and the man who made the martial arts video, get into the reality of the situation, not the fantasy of using ones weapon to heroically save lives.

    The man with the concealed carry, at the Oregon school, made the right choice and showed he understood the limits of the situation. However, to many in the NRA crowd they would fault him for his non-intervention because it makes their own arguments weak. Until America gets past its mythology about the usefulness of guns and their ability to somehow bestow a heroic glory upon their owners, more people will continue to be killed in incidents such as this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s